There are many different problems with the Naturalistic explanation of life. There seems to be no evidence in support of the Naturalsitic explanation of life. I will explain three problems with this view:
1. First off, the Naturalistic view claims that life can come from non-life. How can something that is living evolve from something that is not living. In other words this is saying that if I have a pen, it will eventually turn into something living.
2. In addition, the Naturalsitic view says that animals evolve over time from other species. So something could be a bird, and then millions of years later become a fish. How is this possible? God created such complex organsims that there is no way one complex organsim, can turn into another complex organism. There is simply no possibility for this.
3. Finally, the Naturalsitic view claims that there was no God or some Designer who created life. How can you look at the complexity of everything, and say there was not a mind behind it? You can't. How do you explain cells, the simplest units of life, which are so complex. How do you explain the complexity of the human body? How does our heart know to keep beating? All of life is so detailed and complex, it's ridiculous. There is way too much evidence in favor of a Desginer.
No comments:
Post a Comment